Let us discuss the appearance of being younger. Dermal filler is the quick fix that has been used over the years. However, recently, others have been seeking the older, more lasting remedy: the facelift surgery.
Which of them is really better in the long run? Is filler at last being beaten? We shall put it in plain language.
This is the part that is most significant to comprehend. Their modes of work are totally different.
It is at this point that the debate becomes interesting.
Winner on Longevity: The Facelift surgery. It is a long-term solution, whereas filler is a long-term commitment.
You need to consider the long-term cost and not the cost of a single appointment.
Winner on Long-Term Value: It is a Tie. In the long run (more than 10 years), the cumulative cost can be rather comparable. The option is between a large initial investment (facelift) or a subscription (filler) one.
This is regarding the end outcome.
Winner of the Best Appearance: The Facelift surgery (when done properly). It does not change your natural shapes since it is not adding foreign material to them.
It has nothing to do with beating the other one. It is a matter of having the appropriate tool to use.
A good number of individuals have the best of both worlds. They may even undergo a facelift surgery to take care of the significant sagging and elevate it. Then, many years later, they apply a small filler to keep the cheeks or lips full and look impeccably fresh.
ROYAL COLLEGE OF
SURGEONS
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF
COSMETIC SURGERY
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
LIPOSUCTION SURGERY